top of page
Search
  • Writer's pictureJustBlogStop

6 Major Problems With OpenAI's ChatGPT


 

Illustration of Web

 

ChatGPT is a new and strong AI chatbot that quickly wins over users, yet many have pointed out severe faults. You may ask it anything, and it will respond with a response that sounds like a human wrote it. It learned to comprehend and write by being exposed to a large amount of knowledge on the internet.


However, much like the internet, the boundary between reality and fiction is not often apparent, and ChatGPT has been proven incorrect several times. Here are some of our main concerns regarding how ChatGPT will affect our life.


What Exactly Is ChatGPT?


ChatGPT is a large language model designed to make human speech seem natural. You may converse with ChatGPT the same way you would with anybody else, and it will recall what you have been told in the past and be able to amend itself if you ask it to.


I was proficient with all online material, including Wikipedia, blog postings, novels, and educational publications. This implies that, in addition to reacting to you as a person, it can recall knowledge about our current environment and retrieve historical data from our history.


Learning how to use ChatGPT is simple, and it's easy to believe that the AI system works flawlessly. However, in the months after its release, individuals all around the globe attempted to push the AI chatbot to its limits, revealing several significant issues.


ChatGPT produces false responses.


It can't perform basic arithmetic, answer simple logic questions, and even argue completely erroneous ideas. People on social media will inform you that ChatGPT is prone to making mistakes. Because OpenAI is aware of this constraint, ChatGPT sometimes provides replies that seem correct but are incorrect or make no sense.


This "hallucination" of truth and fiction, as it has been dubbed, is particularly dangerous when offering medical advice or having the facts about significant historical events correct. Other AI assistants, such as Siri and Alexa, search the internet for answers, while ChatGPT does not.


Instead, depending on what it has learned, it constructs a phrase word by word, selecting the token probably to occur next. In other words, ChatGPT obtains an answer by making many guesses. This is why it may justify incorrect responses as if they were correct.


The ChatGPT system is prejudiced by design.


ChatGPT received instruction on the writing of individuals from all over the globe, from the past to the present. This is undesirable since the model may exhibit the same biases as the actual world. ChatGPT has been shown to offer women, people of color, and various other minority groups unfavorable replies.


One explanation for this issue is that the problem is data, and humans are responsible for the biases built into the internet and other locations. However, OpenAI is equally at fault since its researchers and engineers choose the data from which ChatGPT learns.


Again, OpenAI is aware of the issue and has said they are working to resolve it by gathering input from users, who are urged to identify problematic ChatGPT outputs. You may argue that ChatGPT was not intended to be released to the public until these issues were investigated and resolved because they could cause harm.


However, in a rush to be the first firm to deploy the strongest AI tools, OpenAI may throw caution to the wind. On the other hand, Sparrow was published in September 2022 by Alphabet, which controls Google. Sparrow is an AI chatbot as well.


However, it was kept behind locked doors on purpose due to the same safety concerns. Around this time, Facebook published Galactica, an AI language model to aid academic study. People chastised it for producing incorrect and biased findings in scientific studies. Therefore, it was swiftly removed from the market.


ChatGPT might take over people's employment.


Although ChatGPT was created and implemented swiftly, the dust has not yet cleared, and its technology is already being deployed in various commercial applications. GPT-4 has been uploaded to Duolingo and Khan Academy.


The first is a language-learning software, while the second is a comprehensive instructional tool. Both include an AI-powered persona you may converse with within the language you are attempting to learn. Alternatively, you may engage an AI teacher who will comment on your progress as you study.


On the one hand, this might revolutionize the way we learn, making education and learning more accessible to more people. However, this makes long-held positions hard to maintain.


People have always lost their jobs due to technology, but the rate at which AI improves means that many sectors face the same issue. ChatGPT and the technology that allows it to function will significantly influence everything from learning to illustrative examples to client service.


ChatGPT may provide difficulty to high school English students.


You may request that ChatGPT review your writing for errors or provide feedback on improving a paragraph. You may also remove yourself from the equation and allow ChatGPT to perform all the writing. Teachers who attempted offering ChatGPT English assignments received responses superior to many of their pupils. ChatGPT excels in everything, from cover letters to presenting the key points of a well-known book.


ChatGPT may harm actual persons.


We've previously spoken about how incorrect information on ChatGPT may harm individuals in the real world, using incorrect medical guidance as an example. Because the material can be created fast and it seems like a genuine person wrote it, it is simple for fraudsters to pose as someone you know on social media.


It is also easy to detect a phishing email attempting to get sensitive information from you. ChatGPT may also generate text without grammatical errors, which was previously a major red sign. False information is also a significant issue. The volume of information that ChatGPT can generate and its capacity to make even incorrect material feel real will make it more difficult to trust online content.


The speed with which ChatGPT may distribute information has already produced problems for Stack Exchange, a website that provides the right answers to daily queries. People filled this site with concerns they intended ChatGPT to address as soon as it was released.


Maintaining the high quality of replies would be difficult with insufficient human volunteers to wade through the backlog. Not only that, but numerous of the responses were incorrect. All ChatGPT responses were blocked to keep the service running smoothly.


OpenAI has all of the power.


OpenAI has enormous power, which comes with enormous responsibility. It was one of the first AI businesses to make waves in the industry with all its generative artificial intelligence models: Dall-E 2, GPT-3, and GPT-4.


OpenAI chooses what data may be used to train ChatGPT, but the general public has no idea what that data is. We do not understand how ChatGPT is taught, what data was used, where the data came from, or how the system structure is detailed.


Even while OpenAI prioritizes safety, we do not understand how the models function, for better or worse. We can't change your mind on whether the code should be made public or if certain parts should be kept hidden.


We must have complete trust that OpenAI will conduct appropriate research, development, and utilization of ChatGPT. Even if we disagree with the methodology, OpenAI will continue to develop ChatGPT by its aims and ethical standards, if we agree with them or not.

Comments


bottom of page